Call 1-800-949-4ADA
for Technical Assistance
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Since the Executive Summary for the Compliance Manual Section on the Definition of the Term "Disability" was published, the Supreme Court has ruled that the determination of whether a person has an ADA "disability" must take into consideration whether the person is substantially limited in performing a major life activity when using a mitigating measure. This means that if a person has little or no difficulty performing any major life activity because s/he uses a mitigating measure, then that person will not meet the ADA's first definition of "disability." The Supreme Court's rulings were in Sutton v. United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. ____ (1999), and Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 527 U.S. ____ (1999).
As a result of the Supreme Court's ruling, this document's guidance on mitigating measures is superseded. Following the Supreme Court's ruling, whether a person has an ADA "disability" is determined by taking into account the positive and negative effects of mitigating measures used by the individual. The Supreme Court's ruling does not change anything else in this document.
For more information on the Supreme Court rulings and their impact
on determining whether specific individuals meet the definition
of "disability," consult the Instructions for Field Offices:
Analyzing ADA Charges After Supreme Court Decisions Addressing "Disability"
and "Qualified," which can be found on EEOC's website at www.eeoc.gov.
Introduction
Compliance Manual section 902 provides
guidance and instructions for determining whether an individual
has a "disability" as defined by the Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990 (ADA or Act). It has been issued for use
by EEOC investigators when investigating charges of discrimination
under the ADA.
Rationale and Legal Framework
The definition of "disability" under the
ADA reflects Congressional intent to prohibit the specific
forms of discrimination that people with disabilities face.
Since the definition is tailored to the purpose of eliminating
discrimination prohibited by the ADA, it may differ from the
definition of "disability" under other statutes. A determination
of whether a charging party has a "disability" turns on whether
he or she meets the ADA definition of that term.
A charging party has a "disability" for
purposes of the ADA if she or he (1) has a physical or mental
impairment that substantially limits a major life activity,
(2) has a record of such an impairment, or (3) is regarded
as having such an impairment. A charging party must
satisfy at least one of these three parts of the definition
to be considered an individual with a "disability."
To determine whether a charging party has a "disability,"
the investigator first should determine whether the charging
party satisfies the first part of the definition of the term.
If the charging party does not satisfy the first part of the
definition of "disability," or if the investigator after attempting
an analysis is unsure whether the charging party meets the
first part, then the investigator should determine whether he
or she satisfies the second or third part of the definition.
When determining whether a charging party
satisfies the definition of "disability," the investigator
should remember that the concepts of "impairment," "major
life activity," and "substantially limits" are relevant to
all three parts of the definition of "disability." The
investigator also should remember that the "disability" determination
should be made without regard to the availability of mitigating
measures. Further, the investigator should remember
that certain conditions are specifically excluded from the
definition of "disability."
Application of the Definition of "Disability"
Below is a brief summary of some topics
relevant to the determination of whether a charging party
satisfies the ADA definition of "disability."
Impairment
* An impairment
is a physiological disorder affecting one or more of a number
of body systems or a mental or psychological disorder.
* The following
conditions are not impairments:
* environmental, cultural, and economic
disadvantages
* homosexuality and bisexuality
* pregnancy
* physical characteristics
* common personality traits
* normal deviations in height, weight, or strength.
Major Life Activities
* Examples of major
life activities listed in the Title I regulations include
caring for oneself, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing,
hearing, speaking, breathing, learning,
and working.
* Other examples
of major life activities include sitting, standing, lifting,
and mental and emotional processes such as thinking, concentrating,
and interacting with others.
Substantially Limits
* An impairment
is substantially limiting if it prohibits or significantly
restricts an individual's ability to perform a major life
activity as compared to the ability of the average person
in the general population to perform the same activity.
* The determination
of whether an impairment substantially limits a major life
activity depends on the nature and severity of the impairment,
the duration or expected duration of the impairment, and the
permanent or long-term impact of the impairment.
* An impairment
substantially limits an individual's ability to work if it
prevents or significantly restricts the individual from performing
a class of jobs or a broad range of
jobs in various classes.
* Although very
short-term, temporary restrictions generally are not substantially
limiting, an impairment does not have to be permanent to rise
to the level of a disability. Temporary impairments
that take significantly longer than normal to heal, long-term
impairments, or potentially long-term impairments of indefinite
duration may be disabilities if they are severe.
* Chronic or episodic
disorders that are substantially limiting when active or have
a high likelihood of recurrence in substantially limiting
forms may be disabilities.
* An individual
who has two or more impairments that are not substantially
limiting by themselves but that together substantially limit
one or more major life activities has a
disability.
Record
* An individual
has a record of a substantially limiting impairment if she
or he
* has a history of a substantially limiting
impairment or
* has been misclassified as having a substantially
limiting impairment.
Regarded
* An individual
is regarded as having a substantially limiting impairment if
he or she
* has an impairment that does not substantially
limit major life activities
but is treated by a covered entity as constituting such limitation,
* has an impairment that substantially limits major
life activities only as a result of
the attitudes of others toward such impairment, or
* has no impairment but is treated by a covered
entity as having a substantially
limiting impairment.
* An employer regards
an individual as having an impairment that substantially limits
the major life activity of working if it treats the individual
as having an impairment that disqualifies or significantly
restricts the individual from working in a class of jobs or
a broad range of jobs in various classes.
Illegal Use of Drugs
* The statute and
regulations exclude from the definition of "disability" an
individual currently engaging in the illegal use of drugs
when the covered entity acts on the basis of the use.
This exclusion, however, does not apply to an individual who
has a record of illegal use of drugs but no longer uses drugs
illegally or who is erroneously regarded as engaging in such
use.
* An individual does not automatically
satisfy the definition of "disability" simply because she
or he has a record of the illegal use of drugs or is erroneously
regarded as engaging in such use. The record or perception
must pertain to a record or perception that the individual
is or was addicted to drugs. A record or perception
of occasional, casual use of drugs does not constitute a disability.
This page was last modified on February 1, 2000.
Outside Links will Open Up in a New Window
contact us: DBTAC
Southwest ADA Center
800-949-4232 or 713-520-0232 v/tty